南京大学外国语学院英语系学位论文撰写要求
Instructions for the Preparation of M.A. Theses and Ph.D. Dissertations
The English Department, School of Foreign Studies,
February 2003
Table of
Contents
Chapter One Responsibilities of M.A. and Ph.D. Candidates
Chapter Two The Format of a Thesis or Dissertation
2.1.6 Lists of Tables and Figures
2.2.7 Tables, Figures, Charts, and Illustrations
Chapter Three Sample References
Chapter Four Argumentation and Evidence
4.1 Developing a Thesis Statement
Chapter Five Plagiarism and Documentation
Appendix: Typical Thesis/Dissertation Structure
6 Tip: A Sensible and Effective Way to Write a Thesis
A thesis or dissertation should be a work of original scholarship that contributes to the advancement of a scholarly or professional field, demonstrates a candidate’s competence in a specialty, and shows an ability to plan and execute a document of scholarly quality.
Every M.A. or Ph.D. candidate must assume full responsibility for preparing the thesis or dissertation in an acceptable and consistent style and format. Before beginning the first draft of your thesis or dissertation, study this manual carefully with attention to every detail. Follow its instructions faithfully. This manual takes precedence over any other authority with respect to the matters with which it deals. If there is any apparent conflict, this manual is to be followed. You may not be granted permission to defend your thesis or dissertation if you fail to comply with this manual.
Each candidate, upon submitting the thesis or dissertation, must also submit a letter of declaration as shown in Figure 1.
A candidate must follow the form of the title page illustrated by Figure 2.
A page of acknowledgements offers an opportunity to express thanks to persons who have been helpful and to acknowledge authors and publishers of materials used. If any part of the work is collaborative, it should be specified who contributed what to which sections. The acknowledges are signed with the candidate’s initials, typed or written in permanent black ink.
Figure 1 A Sample Letter of Declaration
|
Figure 2 A Sample Title Page
|
The content of an abstract cannot be specified uniformly owing to the diversity of possible topics and treatments. It generally contains (1) a statement of purpose, problem, or hypothesis; (2) methods or procedures; (3) results; and (4) conclusions.
To meet international standards, the length of the English abstract is limited to a maximum of 350 words. The length of the Chinese abstract should conform to the requirements of the Graduate School of Nanjing University. Mathematical formulae, diagrams, and other illustrative materials are not recommended for the printed abstract. Reference to specific works in the abstract should be avoided.
The first page should bear the centered heading “ABSTRACT,” the title of the thesis, and the name of the candidate, with quadruple spacing (three lines) before, between and after each item. The text should follow the same paragraph format as the body of the thesis.
The Table of Contents lists the chapter titles and every subordinate heading, whether major or minor, in exactly the same words that appear in the text. Entries should be single-spaced and separated from one another by one and half spaces. Graduated indentations should precede subordinate headings.
A List of Tables gives the serial number, full title, and page number of every table included in the thesis. A List of Figures on a separate page following the Table of Contents gives the same information for each figure, chart, and illustration.
Each chapter’s title should appear in bold and enlarged type on a new page (See Figure 3).
Subchapter headings should appear in bold type with initial capitals flush with the left margin.
Use
only A4 white paper of good quality and leave sufficient margins (top:
The
typefaces (fonts) used must be kept consistent throughout the thesis. Times
New Roman
The first line of each paragraph should begin with an indentation of ONE TAB (5 spaces).
The main text should be 1.5 SPACED throughout. SINGLE SPACING should be used for block quotations and illustrative examples. Additional spacing precedes and follows headings as set forth below:
Quadruple spacing (three lines) precedes a chapter number;
1.5 spacing between a chapter number and title;
Quadruple spacing follows a chapter title;
Double spacing precedes a section heading; and
1.5 spacing follows a section heading.
Figure 3 The New Page for a Chapter (Sample)
|
Chapter Two Translatability and Functional Equivalence 2.1 Definition of Key Terms |
All pages of the thesis or dissertation (including appendices) must be numbered in the lower right corner, beginning with the first page of the first chapter. Small Roman numerals (i, ii, iii, iv, etc.) are used for Prefatory Matter (title page, Table of Contents, List of Tables, List of Figures, Acknowledgements, etc.). The title page’s number is omitted, so “ii” should appear on the following page.
References to materials used in a document enables readers to evaluate its author’s accuracy and deepen their own acquaintances with the issues at hand. Citation systems may differ from one another in details of order, capitalization, abbreviation and punctuation. An M.A. or Ph.D. candidate should consistently adhere to either the MLA’s or the APA’s respective conventions.
A parenthetical citation belongs to the clause in which the cited material occurs and should thus precede the punctuation mark that ends the clause. It is not, however, part of any clause in a block quotation and should accordingly follow the last clause.
Quotations must be accurate and must signal changes by use of brackets and ellipses.
A short quotation of fewer than three lines should be incorporated into the text and set off by quotation marks. A comma or period precedes the closing quotation mark under all circumstances even if only one word is quoted. A colon or semicolon always follows the quotation mark. A question mark follows the quotation mark unless the question is itself part of the material quoted.
A longer quotation (of more than three lines) should be set off in a separate paragraph called a “block quotation.” A block quotation is single spaced within margins ONE TAB or five spaces wider than those of its surrounding text. An additional indentation of four spaces should precede the first line that begins a new sentence (rather than continues a sentence from the text). Quotation marks are NOT used at the beginning and end of block quotations.
The reference citation of each quotation must state the exact page or pages quoted.
Tables and figures should not be wider than the text. In exceptional cases oversized tables or charts may be folded in from the right provided that the same margin is maintained as on a normal text page. Still larger tables and charts may be reduced by a photo-duplication process to paper of standard size.
All references cited in the text must be listed in a “Works Cited” or “References” section (depending on the style manual the candidate follows) that follows the last chapter but precedes the appendices. The references must be arranged alphabetically by their authors’ surnames and should not be numbered. They should contain the information in the order prescribed by the style manual. The reference list begins a new page.
An appendix contains material that threatens to interrupt the thesis’ flow or bore its reader unbearably. Information provided in an appendix should be necessary and complete.
Appendix pages continue the pagination of the thesis as a whole. The letter designation, full title, and page number of each appendix should appear in the Table of Contents.
|
. |
Modern Language Association (MLA) |
American Psychological Association (APA) |
参考文献著录规则(国家标准局 |
|
. |
Works Cited |
References |
参考文献 |
|
Journal article |
Stewart, Donald C. “What Is an English Major, and What Should It Be?” College Composition and Communication 40 (1989): 188-202. |
Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: A commentary. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 373-380. |
王力胜,医用药理学. 自然杂志,1977, 6(7): 25 |
|
Journal article: two authors |
Brownell, Hiram H., and Heather H. Potter. “Inference Deficits in Right-Brain Damaged Patients.” Brain and Language 27 (1986): 310-21. |
Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-305. |
|
|
Journal article: more than two authors |
Mascia-Lees, Frances E., Pat Sharpe, and Colleen B. Cohen. “Double Liminality and the Black Woman Writer.” American Behavioral Scientist 31 (1987): 101-14. |
Barringer, H. R., Takeuchi, D. T., & Xenos, P. C. (1990). Education, occupational prestige and income of Asian Americans: Evidence from the 1980 Census. Sociology of Education, 63, 27-43. |
|
|
Book |
Graff, Gerald. Professing
Literature: An Institutional History. |
Rossi, P. H. (1989). Down
and out in |
|
|
Book: revised edition |
Erikson, Erik. Childhood
and Society. 2nd ed. |
Kail, R. (1990). Memory development in children (3rd ed.). |
|
|
Book: corporate author |
College Board. College-bound
Seniors: 1989 SAT Profile. |
American Psychiatric
Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders (3rd ed., rev.). |
上海第一医学院编. 医用药理学. 北京:人民卫生出版社,1977. 25 |
|
Book: no author |
Guidelines for the
Workload of College English Teacher. |
Standards for
educational and psychological tests. (1985). |
|
|
Edited book |
Kerckhove, Derrick de, and Charles J. Lumsden,
eds. The Alphabet and the Brain: The Lateralization of Writing. |
Campbell, J. P.,
Campbell, R. J., & Associates. (Eds.). (1988). Productivity in
organizations. |
王力胜,李文编. 医用药理学. 北京:人民卫生出版社,1977. |
|
Selection from edited book |
Glover, David. “The
Stuff That Dreams Are Made Of: Masculinity, Femininity, and the Thriller.” Gender,
Genre and Narrative Pleasure. Ed. Derek Longhurst.
|
Wilson, S. F. (1990).
Community support and integration: New directions for outcome research. In S.
Rose (Ed.), Case management: An overview and assessment (pp. 13-42). |
王力胜,医用药理学综述. 见:李文等编. 医用药理学. 北京:人民卫生出版社,1977. 25-29 |
|
Translated book |
Lacan, Jacques. Ecrits: A
Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. |
Michotte, A. E. (1963). The perception of causality (T. R. Miles & E.
Miles, Trans.). |
|
|
Republished book |
Hurston, Zora Neale. Their Eyes Were Watching God. 1937. |
Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology.
|
|
|
Magazine article |
Miller, Mark Crispen. “Massa, Come Home.” New Republic 16 Sept. 1981: 29-32. |
Gibbs, N. (1989,
April 24). How |
|
|
Newspaper article |
“Literacy on the
job.” |
Freudenheim, M. (1987, December 29). Rehabilitation in head injuries in business and helath. New York Times, p. D2. |
王力胜,医用药理学. 光明日报,1977. 3.25(3) |
|
Review |
Kidd, John. “The
Scandal of Ulysses.” Rev. of Ulysses: The Corrected Text, by
Hans Walter Gabler. |
Falk, J. S. (1990). [Review of Narratives from the crib]. Language, 66, 558-562. |
|
|
Report available from ERIC |
Baurer, Barbara A. A Study of the Reliabilities and Cost Efficiencies of Three Methods of Assessment for Writing Ability. ERIC, 1981. ED 216 357. |
Hill, C., &
Larson, E. (1984). What reading tests call for and what children do. |
|
|
University report |
Flower, Linda. The
Role of Task Representation in |
Elman, J., & Zipser, D. (1987). Learning the hidden structure of
speech (Report No. 8701). Institute for Cognitive Science, |
|
|
Dissertation |
Hubert, Henry Allan.
“The Development of English Studies in Nineteenth-Century Anglo- Canadian
Colleges.” Diss. U of |
Thompson, L. (1988). Social
perception in negotiation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, |
王力胜,(学位论文). 医用药理学. 北京:北京大学英语系,1977. 25 |
|
Conference paper |
Moffett, James.
“Censorship and Spiritual Education.” The Right to Literacy Conference. |
Hogan, R., Raskin, R., & Fazzini, D.
(1988, October). The dark side of charisma. Paper presented at the
Conference on Psychological Measures and Leadership, |
|
|
Internet articles based on a print periodical |
Bleich, Eric. “From International Ideas to Domestic Policies:
Educational Multiculturalism in |
VandenBos, G., Knapp, S., & Doe, J. (2001). Role of reference elements in the selection of resources by psychology undergraduates. Journal of Bibliographic Research, 5, 117-123. Retrieved Oct. 13, 2001, from http://jbr.org/articles.html. |
|
|
Article in an Internet-only journal |
Burka, Lauren P. “A Hypertext History of Multi-User Dimensions.” MUD History. 1993. http://www.utopia.com /talent /lpb/muddex /essay (2 Aug. 1996). |
Fredrickson, B. L.
(2000, March 7). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and
well-being. Prevention & Treatment, 3, Article |
|
|
Newspaper article (electronic version by search) |
Verhovek, Sam Howe. “Microsofts Might Be Better Than One.” The New York Times. 1 May 2000. Retrieved 3 June 2001 <http://www.nytimes.com/ library/tech/00/05/Biztech_articles /01seat.html>. |
Hilts, P. J. (1999, February 16). In forecasting their emotions, most people flunk out. New York Times. Retrieved November 21, 2000, from http://www.nytimes.com. |
|
|
Stand-alone document on the Internet |
Eilola, John. “Little Machines: Rearticulating Hypertext Users.” 3 Dec. 1994. ftp://ftp.daedalus. com/pub/CCCC95 /john-eilola (14 Aug 1996). |
GVU’s 8th WWW user survey. (n.d.). Retrieved August 8, 2000, from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/usersurveys/survey1997-10/. |
|
|
Document available on university program or department Web site |
Felluga, Dino. Undergraduate Guide to Literary Theory. 17 Dec.
1999. |
Chou, L., McClintock,
R., Moretti, F., & Nix, D. H. (1993). Technology
and education: New wine in new bottles: Choosing pasts and imagining
educational futures. Retrieved August 24, 2000, from |
|
|
Electronic copy retrieved from database |
Christopher, |
Brockman, E. & Belanger, K. (2001, January). CPA recruiters’ preferences for resume length. Business Communication, 38 (1), 29. Retrieved June 20, 2001, from InfoTrac College Edition database, Article No. A71327300. |
|
|
Posting to an online discussion group |
Stevens, Melissa. “Take Our Daughters to Work Day.” Online posting. 24 Apr. 2001. Career and Workplace Issues Forum. Retrieved 2 May 2001 <http://forums. nytimes.com/webin/WebX?13@@efded73>. |
Weylman, C. R. (2001, September 4). Make news to achieve positive press [Msg. 98]. Message posted to http://groups.yahoo. com/group/sales-marketing-tips/ message/98 |
|
|
Online reference source |
“Fine Arts.” Dictionary
of CulturalLiteracy. 2nd ed. Ed. E. D. Hirsch,
Jr., Joseph F. Kett, and James Trefil.
|
Fine arts. (1993). In
E. D. Hirsch, Jr., J. F. Kett, & J. Trefil (Eds.), Dictionary of cultural literacy. |
|
|
Software Programs and Video Games |
ID Software. The
Ultimate Doom. |
ID Software. (1993). The ultimate doom. NY: GT Interactive Software. |
|
|
Content notes (For further comment, explanation, or information) |
Examples are
conveniently available in Weinberg. See Segni, Rettorica et poetica d’Aristotile (Firenze,
1549) 281, qtd. in Weinberg 1:405, and Salviati, Poetica d’Aristotle
parafrasata e comnetata, 1586, ms. |
|
|
|
Bibliographic notes (sources or evaluative comments on sources) |
For a sampling of
materials that reflect the range of experiences related to recent
technological changes, see Moulthrop, pars. 39-53; Armstrong,
Yang, and |
|
|
|
preface/introduction |
Doctorow, E. L.
Introduction. Sister Carrie. by Theodore
Dreiser. |
|
|
4.1 Developing a Thesis Statement
A thesis or dissertation is like a long essay made up of short essays, i.e., chapters. Each chapter is likewise made up of shorter essays, i.e., sections and sub-sections. The analogy extends all the way to individual paragraphs, which can be regarded as mini-essays. All these long and short “essays” must be written in a way that best serves their readers: as readers begin to read an essay, what they want to know most (and therefore what you as the writer should tell them first) is the purpose and argument of writing, i.e., your thesis.
Every section and paragraph of your thesis or dissertation should include a clear thesis statement. That is to say, everything you write in that section or paragraph should contribute to the exposition of a main point or central idea. The thesis statement specifies your main point or central idea in one or two sentences. Taking the trouble to rewrite these theses as you develop your arguemnt will help you discover what you really want to argue. The following points may help you refine your thesis statements.
Since most of your readers are busy people, you should always provide a thesis early in every section you write in order to establish your position and give your reader a sense of direction. Avoid burying a thesis statement in the middle or deferring it to the end of a paragraph.
Specify a single idea to be developed in each section or paragraph. In the following two examples, the writer has split the energy between two topics:
Queen
Printing has had a long and complex history during which it has brought about social and cultural reforms.
In both cases, two large statements are loosely connected. More unified theses could be developed through clarifying the relationship between the two statements, as in
Queen
The development of printing sparked the Protestant Reformation by multiplying the text of religious authorities.
If two statements are not going to have an easy marriage, settle on ONE single focus and proceed with further development. Always make sure that each paragraph covers only one topic or one aspect of a topic.
Each thesis statement should provide a restricted focus. Narrow down your discussion to a specific line of argumentation within a broad topic area. Consider the following:
There are serious objections to the communicative approach to language teaching.
Here, the thesis is broad, sprawling or superficial, but consider the following versions:
The communicative approach to language teaching sets out to emphasize cultivating the student’s fluency, but it actually encourages the student to ignore accuracy.
In this case, the thesis is focused, narrow, crisp, and “accomplishable” in a few paragraphs or pages.
Avoid vague (“some,” “certain,” “a kind of,” etc.) or abstract (“interesting,” “negative,” “exciting,” “unusual,” “difficult,” etc.) words that tell the reader next to nothing.
Avoid technical language. Always avoid jargon.
Check to see if you need to define your terms (“internal/external factor,” “translation culture,” “commercialism”) and then decide on the most appropriate place to do so.
You should support every claim you make with specific evidence. Whether you are studying a literary work or reporting the findings from your qualitative data, make clear references to specific facts. Mere assertions with inadequate or no factual support amount to unacceptable dogmatism, and absolutist statements impose logical burdens beyond the capacity of evidence. Consider the following:
Viola notes that a professional fool must be intelligent (3.1.63).
Viola notes that to be a professional fool “craves a kind of wit” (3.1.63).
The second version is preferred to the first because, in the first, the paraphrase is inaccurate and absolutist and leaves out the subtle meanings in Viola’s remark.
After you supply the evidence, you should also explain how such evidence supports the conclusion you draw from it if that is not self-evident. For instance, instead of:
Olivia proves herself a liar when she falls in love with Cesario.
consider:
Olivia’s instant infatuation with Cesario casts doubt on the sincerity of her reported determination to mourn for seven years.
Construct your sentence so that quotations fit their grammatical structure. The sentence should be grammatically correct with or without the quotation marks. Use brackets “[…]” to signal changes made in material cited for grammatical purposes and “[sic.]” to call attention to errors in the material cited.
Plagiarism means to take another person’s WORDS or IDEAS without
acknowledging where they are from and use them as if they were your own. It can
be either deliberate or accidental. Plagiarism is taken very seriously in
higher education. In
To avoid either deliberate or accidental plagiarism, you MUST make it clear when the words or ideas that you are using are your own and when they are taken from another writer. The ideas and people that you refer to need to be made explicit by a system of referencing.
Documentation means to use or refer to somebody or something as a source in the writing. If you use a result, observation, or generalization that is not your own, you must document it, i.e. specify its source. This practice is important in the scientific and academic world for three reasons:
(1) It allows the reader to verify your starting position. Good referencing allows one to check the foundations of your additions to the structure of knowledge in the discipline, or at least to trace them back to a level which one judges to be reliable;
(2) It enables the reader to distinguish your original contributions; and
(3) It protects writers against suspicions of cheating or plagiarism.
There are two ways in which you can refer to, or cite, another person’s work: by paraphrase or direct quotation.
This simply means stating another’s ideas in your own words. You can either paraphrase if you want to keep the length the same or summarize if you want to make it shorter. There are two main ways of showing that you have used another writer’s ideas:
Kuhiwezak (1990) makes an insightful analysis of the misreading of Milan Kundera’s novel The Joke by both the author’s own country and the West.
An insightful analysis (Kuhiwezak 1990) has been made of the misreading of Milan Kundera’s novel The Joke by both the author’s own country and the West.
They differ in whether or not the name of the cited author occurs in the citing sentence or in parenthesis.
If you refer to a particular part of a source, page number(s) as well as date of publication MUST be supplied. For instance,
Occasionally you may want to quote another author’s words exactly. For example:
David Crystal (1985:240) defined pragmatics as “the study of language from the point of view of the users, especially of the choices they make, the constraints they encounter in using language in social interaction, and the effects their use of language has on the other participants in an act of communication.”
The citation “(1985: 240)” (APA style) tells readers that the information in the
sentence was derived from Page 240 of a work published in 1985 by an author
named
Crystal, D. (1985). The English Language. Harmondsworth: Penguim.
A quotation should not repeat information or contradict your point. Do not use direct quotation
when the information is well-known in your subject area;
when you cannot understand the meaning of the original source; or
when you are not able to paraphrase the original.
You may wish to omit some of a source’s original words that are not relevant to your argument. An ellipsis “...” indicates such an omission. If you omit any of an author’s original words, make sure you do not change the passage’s meaning. For instance,
He stated, “The ‘placebo effect,’ ... disappeared when behaviors were studied in this manner” (Smith, 1982:276), but he did not clarify which behaviors were studied.
If you need to insert material (additions, explanations, alterations) into a quotation, use brackets ([...]). For instance,
Smith (1982:276) found that “the placebo effect, which had been verified in previous studies, disappeared when [his own and others’] behaviors were studied in this manner.”
If the material quoted already contains a quotation, use single quotation marks for the internal quotation (‘...’).
He stated, “The ‘placebo effect,’ ... disappeared when behaviors were studied in this manner” (Smith, 1982:276), but he did not clarify which behaviors were studied.
If you have not actually read the work to which you are referring, you should cite the secondary source in which you encountered it. In the text, you MUST use one of the following ways to indicate this:
According to Jones (as cited in Smith, 1982:276)…
Do love stories, apart from happening, being, have something to say? For all my skepticism, I had clung to a few superstitions — the strange conviction, for example, that everything in life that happens to me has a sense beyond itself, means something, that life in its day-to-day events speaks to us about itself so that it gradually reveals a secret, that it takes the form of a rebus whose message must be deciphered, that the stories we live in comprise the mythology of our lives and in that mythology lies the key to truth and mystery. Is it all an illusion? Possibly, even probably, but I can’t seem to rid myself of the need to decipher my life continually. (Kundera, 1983:140; cited in Kuhiwezak, 1990:127)
A quotation should add something to the point you are making, supporting your idea with evidence, examples, illustrations, or the weight of an authority, but IT SHOULD NEVER DO YOUR WORK FOR YOU: never try to substitute a quotation for your own analysis, argumentation, illustration, etc.
The citation giving the year of publication is of the APA documentation style. In the MLA style, the parenthetical citation does not include the year of publication. Consider the following example:
Ancient writers attributed the invention of the monochord to Pythagoras, who lived in the sixth century BC (Marcuse 197).
The citation “(Marcuse 197)” indicates that the information was derived from page 197 of a work by an author named Marcuse and that more information about this source is available in the Works Cited list, where readers can find:
Marcuse,
Sibyl. A Survey of Musical Instruments.
Use footnotes in the following situations:
1. Content notes offering the reader comment, explanation, or information that the primary text cannot accommodate. In the footnote, avoid lengthy discussions that divert the reader’s attention from the primary text. For example, you may use a note to give full publication facts for an original source for which you cite an indirect source and to explain why you worked from secondary material. If you write
The commentary of the sixteenth-century literary scholars Bernardo Segni and Lionardo Salviati shows them to be less-than-faithful followers of Aristotle [1].
you add a footnote
Note
[1] Examples
are conveniently available in Weinberg. See Segni, Rettorica et poetica
d'Aristotile (Firenze, 1549) 281, qtd. in Weinberg 1:405, and Salviati, Poetica d'Aristotle parafrasata e comnetata,
1586, ms.
Then, on your “Works Cited” list, you add
Works Cited
Weinberg,
Bernard. A History of Literary Ciriticism
in the Italian Renaissance. 2 vols.
2. Bibliographic notes containing either several sources or evaluative comments on sources. Use notes for evaluative comments on sources and for references containing numerous citations.
Technological advancements have brought advantages as well as unexpected problems [2].
The footnote indicate these sources:
Note
[2] For a sampling of materials that reflect the range of experiences related to recent technological changes, see Moulthrop, pars. 39-53; Armstrong, Yang, and Cuneo 80-82; Craner 308-11.
In “Moulthrop, pars. 39-53,” “pars” means “paragraphs.” All these sources should be documented in detail in the “Works Cited” list, as in
Works Cited
Armstrong, Larry, Dori Jones yang, and Alice Cuneo. “The Learning Revolution: Technology Is Reshaping Education ― at Home and at School.” Business Week 28 Feb. 1994: 80-88.
Craner, Paul M. “New Tool for an Ancient Art: The Computer and Music.” Computers and the Humanities 25 (1991): 303-13.
Moulthrop, Stuart. “You Say You Want a Revolution? Hypertext and the Laws of Media.” Postmodern Culture 1.3 (1991): 53 pars. 12 July 1998 <http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/pmc/text-only/issue.591/moulthro.591>
Thesis writing is a repeated process of revision. After you finish a draft, you should carefully go over it and reconsider the substance and style of every section, paragraph and sentence. The following are a few things student writers should bear in mind:
First, try to use active voice rather than passive voice. In most cases,
L2 learners notice the “gaps” and “holes” during the enhanced output exercises.
is more direct, more lively and less wordy than
The “gaps” and “holes” are noticed by L2 learners during the enhanced output exercises.
In other situations, we may change nouns ending with “-tion” into verbs. For example, we can transform “frustration” into “frustrate” and “allocation” into “allocate.”
Compare the following:
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is dominated by a sense of the main character’s brooding over the nature of man in society.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet constantly broods over man’s place in society.
The first version is not nearly so effective as the second because, with a strong of prepositions, it is passive, indirect and vague in meaning.
Beware of pairs of words that sacrifice plain sense to contrived rhythm: “With careless nonchalance, she threw her bag over her shoulder.” Clearly, either “carelessly” or “nonchalantly” will serve your purpose; you don’t need both.
Also, expletives (“there are”, “it is”) often launch weak sentences: “There are many people who find modernity intimidating.” Try either of the following:
Modernity intimidates many people.
Many people fear modernity.
Notice how, without any transitional words, we cannot be sure what the relationship is between “I stopped exercising” and “I gained 50 pounds.” Did the speaker stop exercising because he had gained fifty pounds? Or did he gain fifty pounds because he stopped exercising? Did exercise or the lack thereof have anything to do with the speaker’s weight gain? A revision should clarify this relationship:
After I stopped exercising, I gained 50 pounds.
For prefatory matter, you may refer to relevant sections in Chapter Two. It includes the following:
Declaration
Title Page
Acknowledgments
Abstract
The abstract may consists of the following elements:
(a) A clear statement of topic and purpose;
(b) A description of the methodology (subjects, instruments, procedures and analyses);
(c) A summary of the results; and
(d) A conclusion of their implications.
Table of Contents
Lists of Tables and Figures
State the problem you intend to analyze as simply as you can. Try to step back mentally and take a broad view of it. How does it fit into your discipline?
Do not overestimate the reader’s familiarity with your topic. You are writing for researchers in a general area, but not all of them need be specialists in your particular topic. It may help to imagine a researcher who investigates a different area of your common field. This colleague of yours shares your intelligence and general background but knows little of the literature or methods that apply to your specialty.
The introduction should engage your reader. A reader who loses interest in your introduction will not likely rediscover it in the more specific section that follow.
This section might require several drafts for substance, style, and concision. It is a good idea to ask a non-specialist to read it and to comment on its substance and style. There is an argument for writing this section — or at least revising it significantly — towards the end of the thesis-writing process. Your introduction should set your thesis within a context of wider meaning or more general interest that may only occur to you after extended analysis.
You should review the literature of the field. That is, you should introduce the background of or rationale for your study, state how previous research relates to your study, and provide a framework within which your study was carried out. You should answer the following questions, which readers will raise:
Where did the problem come from? What is already known about this problem? What other methods have been tried to solve it?
You should also clarify the research purpose. To be specific, you state precisely the purpose of your study, present research questions that spell out what was being investigated, and provide specific research hypotheses.
The description of the study requires that you report on the process of obtaining the evidence for your argument. This part varies enormously from thesis to thesis, and may be omitted in theoretical theses or dissertations, but regardless of the type of thesis, you should follow one principle: it much contain enough detail so that a competent researcher can reproduce exactly what you have done by following your description. There is a good chance that this test will be applied: sometime after you have left, another researcher will want to do a similar experiment either with your gear or on a new set-up in a foreign country. Try to write for the benefit of that researcher.
In terms of the methodology, there are four major components: subjects, instruments, procedures, and analyses.
The subjects refer to people, animals or things that are made to under go your treatment, experiment or analysis. You should indicate their sources, characteristics, and selection process.
The instruments refer to the tools or materials used to collect data. They can be questionnaires, tests or interview questions; they should be included in appendices, but in the thesis, you should report on their origin, content, purpose, reliability and validity. The instruments may also be special equipment (sometimes put under the heading “Equipment” or “Apparatus”); you should also describe them their reliability and validity.
The procedures refer to the steps you followed in gathering data for your study. You describe the process of data collection, that is, how the instruments and equipment were used for data collection — how the study was conducted.
The analyses refer to the steps you followed in analyzing the data. You report on the process you went through to find out what your data revealed about your topic. If you applied statistical procedures, this is where you report how.
Your language here must be simple and clear. The past tense should be used for a study that has already been completed.
When you are reporting theoretical work that is not original, you will usually need to include sufficient material to allow the reader to understand the arguments used and their bases. Do not include the theory not related to the work you have done.
When you are reporting your own theoretical work, you must include more detail, but you may consider moving lengthy analyses to appendices.
Suspense is not necessary in reporting scientific and academic study: you should tell the reader where you are going before you start.
In this part of the thesis, you report the results of your study and discuss their implications for your discipline.
In the case of a primary study, you will first present a summary of the data you have collected and then present the results of the analyses of the data. These results are called research findings. They should meet two criteria: first, they should be true “findings” in the sense that they explain something others do not yet know; then, they should be findings of some value, i.e. they should explain something that can benefit others. In statistical studies, this technical summary is often presented in tables or figures for the sake of economy.
One thing to remember is that disproving a hypothesis can be as effective as confirming one.
In discussing your findings, ask these questions: What do they mean? How do they fit into the existing body of knowledge? Are they consistent with current theories? Do they contain new insights? Do they suggest new theories or mechanisms?
Try to distance yourself from your work so as to examine it from a wider perspective. Ask yourself not only what it means in terms of the orthodoxy of your own specialty but also how other people in the field might see it. Does it have any implications that do not relate to the questions that you set out to answer?
Chapters on results and discussions are best organized by subject matter.
Your abstract should state your conclusions with maximum concision. A summary of conclusions expands on this statement, developing and qualifying its contents in accordance with the significance of your various findings.
It is often the case that scientific investigations yield more questions than answers. Does your work suggest any promising directions? Are there ways in which researchers could improve on your work? What are the practical implications of your work?
The conclusion chapter should be reasonably short — a few pages usually suffice. As with the introduction, it is a good idea to ask someone who is not a specialist to read this section and to comment. Normally, it contains three items: (1) major findings presented in non-technical terms; (2) implications for the field, i.e., expanding your thesis from its particular focus to show how it bears on wider research circles; and (3) limitations of the study and suggestions for future research.
For postscriptural matter, you may refer to relevant sections in Chapter Two. It includes:
References
Appendices
Items typically appended to theses include: questionnaires, test papers, computer programs, data files, pictures, and diagrams.
6 Tip: A Sensible and Effective Way to Write a Thesis
Proceed from Methodology to Results and Discussion, then work on Introduction, and finally complete Prefatory Matter. (Postscriptural Matter should be prepared as you go along with the various steps of your research.)
[1] Examples
are conveniently available in Weinberg. See Segni, Rettorica et poetica
d'Aristotile (Firenze, 1549) 281, qtd. in Weinberg 1:405, and Salviati, Poetica d'Aristotle parafrasata e comnetata,
1586, ms.
[2] For
a sampling of materials that reflect the range of experiences related to recent
technological changes, see Moulthrop, pars. 39-53;
Armstrong, Yang, and